Building a cutting-edge data center goes way beyond stacking bricks and steel. You’re managing a high-stakes project packed with electrified systems, cooling plants, critical power loops, and heavy mechanical equipment.
Every safety risk gets magnified in this environment. Your reputation and financial health depend on keeping your team safe and compliant when the pressure is on.
Construction consistently ranks as one of America’s most dangerous industries. In 2023, the industry recorded 1,075 worker fatalities—nearly 20% of all workplace deaths nationwide. Falls accounted for nearly 39% of those deaths.
OSHA reports that four of the top ten most-cited violations involve fall protection, ladders, scaffolding, and training—basic safeguards that should never be overlooked. Even nonfatal injuries carry a heavy cost, with the construction industry recording 2.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers in 2023.
Data center projects provide a lot of lucrative opportunities, but these big, complicated projects intensify safety risks. These job sites combine tight spaces, multiple trades working side-by-side, and mission-critical systems that cannot afford downtime. If contractors aren’t at the top of their game, the complexity could lead to serious incidents
A single safety failure can halt work, trigger costly penalties, or lead to a catastrophic incident. The financial stakes on self-insured data centers are enormous: daily penalties for schedule delays range from $50,000 to $100,000 per day for missing critical milestones, while OSHA penalties now reach $165,514 per willful violation. Owners and general contractors could also face higher insurance premiums and costly workers’ compensation payouts if even a single accident occurs.
Embedding safety and compliance into every phase with adept safety management tools helps protect workers, maintain client trust, and keep high-pressure projects moving forward.
Data center construction has exploded recently. Demand for AI and cloud computing is pushing projects into hyperscale territory.
Industry Analyst McKinsey estimates that demand for AI-ready data center capacity will grow at an average of 33% per year through 2030. At the same time, U.S. data center construction investment hit about $48 billion in 2024 and is projected to more than double by 2030. These projects are going up fast, and there’s a lot of money out there for contractors with strong safety records.
Let’s talk about the logistical issues of a data center build. When you take on a large data center job, you often need to oversee 100 or more subcontractors. Each handles trade-specific tasks—HVAC, electrical, mechanical, fire suppression, structural, and fiber. These trades all punch into overlapping zones where schedules are compressed and windows are tight.
One delay in ductwork or conduit routing can cascade into other issues, and coordination can quickly become a nightmare.
Projects typically involve high-voltage systems up to 360 megawatts that require specialized electrical safety protocols, including arc flash procedures, lock-out/tag-out management, live electrical work permits, and PPE tracking for electrical hazards. The regulatory compliance extends beyond OSHA to include Uptime Institute Tier Certifications, ANSI/TIA-942 standards, ASHRAE cooling guidelines, and LEED certification tracking.
With tight timelines, you need to manage sequencing, spatial conflicts, logistics, and change orders in real time. Delays cost money and missteps risk safety. Missing one handoff can ripple through the entire build.
To win in this environment, your team needs to master communication, rigorous planning, and real-time control across every trade and zone.
Profitability for owners and GCs often depends on finishing on time and on budget. Many contracts now include strict performance incentives and liquidated damages clauses that penalize late completion.
In some cases, general contractors face daily fines between $50,000 and $100,000 per day for missing key milestones. For data centers built for hyperscale owners or cloud providers, every day counts. Each delay means lost revenue for the client and lost incentive pay for the contractor.
When a facility doesn’t open on time, the owner cannot begin selling server capacity or online services. That downtime translates directly into missed earnings and mounting costs. Even a few days of delay can push a project’s breakeven point back by months.
Meanwhile, you are still carrying “standing army” expenses—crew wages, equipment rentals, and site overhead—without progress to offset them.
Safety incidents add another layer of financial strain. Injuries and rework slow production, damage morale, and often trigger costly insurance claims. They can raise your Experience Modification Rate (EMR), a key metric insurers use to price workers’ compensation premiums.
Companies with excellent safety records pay half the insurance premiums of poor performers. A company with an EMR of 1.25 pays 25% more than baseline, while a company at 0.75 enjoys 25% savings—a $55,000 annual difference on just a $100,000 base premium.
A high EMR signals poor safety performance and can make it harder—or even impossible—for a contractor to qualify for certain bids. A single bad year of incidents can increase premiums for three years or more, resulting in lost contracts and fewer profitable opportunities. For general contractors competing in the data center market, that risk can quickly erase profit margins.
Many owners now require an EMR below 1.0 for bidding qualification, automatically disqualifying companies above this threshold from entire project categories. This creates a competitive cascade: higher EMR means higher insurance costs passed to clients, reducing bid competitiveness, which reduces revenue and further constrains safety investments.
Despite advances in technology and training, construction remains one of America’s most dangerous industries. Construction workers experienced 2.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time employees in 2023—a rate that has barely improved in recent years.
The same year, the industry recorded 1,075 worker fatalities, accounting for nearly one out of every five workplace deaths nationwide. Each incident carries direct costs averaging $40,000 to $42,000 for medically consulted injuries and $1.34 million for fatalities according to the National Safety Council.
Data center projects raise that risk even higher. They bring together dozens of trades—electrical, mechanical, fire protection, and structural—all working side-by-side in confined spaces around high-voltage equipment and energized systems.
Falls continue to be the leading killer in construction, with 421 fatal falls to lower levels in 2023. On fast-paced data center jobs, where schedules are compressed and crews often push to hit commissioning deadlines, the margin for error shrinks dramatically.
Beyond the numbers are the people those statistics represent. Every incident ripples through a workforce—shaking morale, trust, and focus. When teams see accidents happening, confidence in leadership and safety systems erodes.
Regulators are taking notice too. OSHA’s FY 2024 enforcement data shows fall protection, scaffolding, and training among the most-cited violations on construction sites. Fall protection violations dominated with 6,307 citations, marking the 12th consecutive year as the most-cited violation.
Construction accounted for 26,005 citations and $119 million in total penalties—the highest of any industry sector. Fines have also increased, with OSHA’s current penalty schedule allowing up to $16,550 per serious violation and $165,514 for willful or repeated violations.
The safety crisis in construction has been an ongoing issue for decades, making strong safety management more important than ever. On data center projects, where complexity, pace, and pressure collide, the consequences of a single lapse can be catastrophic.
Trade stacking refers to multiple subcontractor crews working in the same physical area at the same time. In data center builds, it’s common to see electricians pulling cable beside HVAC installers setting ductwork while fire suppression teams route piping overhead.
Each trade is on a deadline. They all have a job to finish, and every one of them need the same limited space. On fast-track projects, trade stacking is inevitable. Data center construction cycles are shrinking as owners race to meet cloud and AI infrastructure demand over the next few years.
[Pull Quote: “Global demand for data center capacity could rise at an annual rate of between 19 and 22 percent from 2023 to 2030.” — McKinsey)
To meet these aggressive schedules, general contractors often compress timelines, overlapping critical path activities and calling multiple trades into the same zone at once. This “stacking” creates congestion that affects both productivity and safety.
Risks associated with trade stacking rise quickly. More people in a confined area means more noise, more clutter, and less visibility. Crews are forced to work around one another, sometimes standing on different elevations or maneuvering equipment through tight corridors.
A dropped tool, a missed communication, or an energized line left exposed can cause serious harm. In just one example, industry experts have repeatedly linked overcrowded work areas and poor coordination to higher rates of struck-by and caught-between injuries—two of OSHA’s high-priority “Focus Four” hazards.
Trade stacking also introduces hidden risks to quality and compliance. When work overlaps, crews can unintentionally damage or block another trade’s installation, leading to rework or inspection failures later on.
Tight sequencing can cause skipped safety checks, incomplete tie-offs, or unverified lockouts as teams rush to stay on schedule. The faster the job moves, the harder it becomes to maintain safe, consistent standards across every crew on site.
The challenge for general contractors is not just managing the schedule—it is managing the chaos that trade stacking brings. Success requires proactive planning, real-time visibility, and systems that help every trade understand what is happening around them before problems arise.
A near miss is more than just a lucky break—it is a warning. It shows where your safety system is fraying, even if no one gets hurt.
Near misses are unplanned events where damage or injury is narrowly avoided. On a data center construction site, those moments often reveal hidden risks caused by overlapping trades, rushed schedules, or poor communication. Ignoring them allows small problems to grow until something serious happens.
Every subcontractor’s actions affect everyone else working on a massive data center build. When one crew cuts corners, others inherit the risk.
Imagine an HVAC team leaving a scaffold unsecured at the end of a shift. Hours later, an electrical crew uses the same area, unaware that the scaffold is not stable. A single step shifts the platform, sending tools crashing into another work zone below.
That is how one safety lapse cascades through the project. Research shows that weak safety oversight in one trade can quickly spread across an entire jobsite, creating schedule delays, additional hazards, and financial loss for the general contractor.
Imagine a tight corridor inside a data hall. Mechanical installers are working overhead, electrical crews are pulling conduit nearby, and fire suppression teams are finishing pipe runs below. The mechanical crew cuts an opening in the ceiling but forgets to secure temporary protection.
Hours later, an electrician accidentally knocks loose a conduit that falls through the unguarded hole and strikes a worker below. Work stops, investigations begin, and productivity evaporates.
That is the domino effect in real life: how one unchecked hazard turns into a project-wide problem. Industry research shows that poor coordination can trigger a “domino effect,” where small oversights compound into major incidents as risk factors stack up across trades.
On high-pressure data center projects, if one link breaks, the entire operation can falter.
Many contractors still run safety on paper—clipboards, binders, and end-of-shift drop boxes. Paper gets lost, damaged, and delayed, and it does not give you real-time visibility.
OSHA has pushed the industry toward digital reporting with its electronic submission rule for OSHA Forms 300 and 301. Timely, structured data is now expected on larger jobs.
Delays hurt investigations. If a near-miss report sits in a truck or trailer, details fade and hazards linger. Strong programs treat near-miss data as an early warning system. The faster you capture and share what happened, the faster you can remove the risk.
Paper also blocks pattern recognition across dozens of subcontractors. Logs live in silos, so leaders cannot spot trends by trade, zone, shift, or supervisor. Organizations that centralize safety data can surface recurring hazards and weak signals project-wide. If your insights disappear into binders, you create a black hole where lessons should be—no trends, no benchmarking, and no way to prove which controls are working.
One safety director we spoke to described the problem: “It was like a Monday, Friday routine. Monday and Friday, I’m in the office. The only reason I’m in the office Monday and Friday is to start compiling this data, upload photos, update my tracking sheets. Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, I’m in the field. Those two days was just data input, honestly.”
This administrative burden creates dangerous blind spots where hazards go unidentified and corrective actions get delayed. Without real-time safety data, project managers cannot identify trends before they become incidents, allocate resources to high-risk areas, or make data-driven decisions about corrective actions.
GCs working on data center builds may need to oversee more than a hundred subcontractors at once. Some firms have dedicated safety managers, structured audits, and digital reporting tools. Others rely on paper forms and informal toolbox talks.
That difference in safety maturity creates uneven practices that can expose everyone on site to unnecessary risk.
Workforce diversity adds another layer of complexity. As of 2023, nearly one in four construction workers is foreign-born. Language and cultural differences can create gaps in how safety expectations are understood or followed.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that foreign-born Hispanic and Latino workers experience higher fatal injury rates than native-born workers, with construction accounting for many of those incidents. Clear, multilingual communication is not just good practice—it is a life-saving control.
OSHA emphasizes that safety training must be delivered “in a manner that employees can understand.” The agency’s guidance explains that employers are responsible for making sure all workers, regardless of language or literacy level, can comprehend safety information.
This means translated signage, multilingual briefings, and demonstrations that show—not just tell—how to work safely.
High turnover also compounds safety challenges. Construction consistently ranks among the industries with the highest turnover and separation rates. Crews rotate between projects, and new workers often arrive without knowing your site’s safety protocols.
Without consistent onboarding and reinforcement, safety performance declines as fast as the workforce changes.
Consistency across dozens—or hundreds—of subcontractors does not happen by accident. It takes clear expectations, continuous communication, and visible leadership. The makeup and experience of the workforce directly influence safety outcomes. The best general contractors treat alignment as a daily discipline, not a one-time task.
Pre-qualifying a subcontractor based on their safety record is table stakes. It tells you what is on paper, not how crews perform next week on your site.
CPWR notes that common pre-qual metrics like EMR and past injuries are lagging indicators and often miss real-time risk. That is why you pair pre-qualification with ongoing performance monitoring using leading indicators.
Audits and spot checks still matter, but they capture a moment in time, then the job keeps moving. Programs that work treat audits as one signal inside a continuous loop of check, fix, and verify. OSHA’s Recommended Practices stress program evaluation and improvement, including routine checks that the system is actually working in the field and not just written in a binder.
Choose KPIs that reflect behavior, not just outcomes. Keep the required lagging metrics like TRIR and LTIR, and calculate them correctly using the BLS incidence rate formula. Then add leading indicators that drive action: near-miss reporting rate and quality, corrective-action closure time, field-level hazard identification rates, and training completion.
Watch for early warning signs. Spikes in near-miss submissions from one area, repeating low-severity incidents on the same shift, slow or incomplete corrective actions, and audit scores that swing dramatically between crews all point to deeper issues.
Leading signals like these are your chance to intervene before an event occurs. CPWR’s Safety Climate resources show how consistent measurement across multiple trades helps you spot patterns and close gaps across the project, not just inside one company.
Verifying subcontractor compliance has become one of the most time-consuming parts of safety management. Most general contractors still rely on manual systems to collect and review paperwork—certificates of insurance, safety manuals, toolbox talk logs, and training records.
OSHA’s recordkeeping requirements require contractors to maintain accurate and up-to-date documentation for inspections, certifications, and incident logs. But when those records are scattered across emails, spreadsheets, and PDFs, it is nearly impossible to know in real time who is compliant and who is not.
Every subcontractor brings a new layer of complexity. You are tracking certifications, equipment inspection reports, and proof of training for dozens—sometimes hundreds—of workers.
Fragmented reporting structures also make it difficult to verify worker qualifications and equipment safety across multiple employers. Even small oversights can carry big risks: expired certificates of insurance or lapsed training records can leave the general contractor exposed if an incident occurs.
The administrative toll on safety teams is enormous. Hours that could be spent in the field or on training are instead lost to chasing paperwork. Proactive safety management requires shifting resources from documentation to prevention—but many teams never get that chance. Manual verification keeps them stuck in a reactive mindset.
Digital platforms help contractors move beyond a reactive mindset by reducing the amount of labor needed to properly manage safety on massive projects. According to Bamboo, organizations report a 40-60% reduction in administrative effort once manual entry and paper processing are replaced by digital tools. Safety professionals using digital inspection platforms save up to three hours daily compared to paper-based processes.
One contractor with 11 active projects documented that their single-person safety department shifted from spending two days per week on paperwork to spending 2-3 days in the field—an 80% increase in proactive safety presence.
When compliance gaps appear, the consequences extend beyond fines or citations. Missing documentation or poor oversight can lead to insurance disputes and liability claims after an incident. In legal terms, failing to verify a subcontractor’s compliance can be treated as negligence.
For GCs managing high-risk data center projects, that is a costly mistake that can undermine both profitability and reputation.
Every subcontractor brings its own system—or sometimes no system at all. One might track safety data in spreadsheets, another in a mobile app, and others still on paper.
Because these platforms do not connect, the general contractor ends up piecing together fragments instead of seeing one clear picture. More than 60% of construction companies rely on manual data analysis and sharing, leading to lost insights and delays.
Reporting formats and timelines vary just as widely. Some subcontractors send daily logs, others report weekly or only after incidents. Without standardized reporting, vital details slip through the cracks.
Data silos trap critical information inside individual teams, slowing collaboration and reducing accountability across complex projects. For general contractors, this fragmentation creates blind spots. By the time safety reports, inspections, or incident updates arrive, the conditions on site have already changed. Real-time visibility into safety data is essential to identifying hazards before they cause harm.
Without accurate safety data, you’re forced to make decisions on outdated or incomplete information. When you cannot see the full jobsite picture, you cannot respond effectively. Breaking down these barriers requires digital tools that integrate data from every trade and turn it into live, actionable insights.
Effective communication and coordination are core elements of a strong safety system—and those depend on visibility.
When you wait for an incident to occur before correcting a problem, you’ve already failed your crew. That is the problem with old-fashioned, ineffective safety management—it reacts to harm instead of preventing it.
OSHA defines metrics like injury rates and lost-time incidents as lagging indicators, which reflect events that have already occurred. Predictive safety management focuses on leading indicators—the proactive signs that reveal risks before they become incidents. These data points help you identify problems early and correct the course before injuries occur.
The goal is to anticipate high-risk conditions, not just record them. Tracking how often inspections are missed, how long corrective actions stay open, or where crews are working in congested zones allows teams to intervene early. Leading indicators are essential for strengthening jobsite culture and understanding how safety behaviors change across trades and projects.
Trend analysis turns those insights into action. By comparing leading and lagging data across time, trades, and locations, you can identify recurring risks and respond before they escalate. Organizations using predictive analytics in safety reduce incidents faster than those relying on lagging metrics alone.
If you measure the wrong metrics, you won’t have the data you need to drive actionable change. Safety metrics and key performance indicators should push action, not vanity. Proactive measures—like inspections completed, hazards corrected, and near-misses reported—are better at preventing injuries than after-the-fact counts.
Pick metrics that crews can influence today. Track near-miss reporting quality, corrective-action closure time, field inspection frequency, and training completion. For outcome metrics, calculate TRIR and LTIR correctly using the standard formula.
Benchmarking reveals who needs help. When all subs report the same core metrics, you can compare performance by trade, zone, and shift. Industry research shows that structured prequalification and consistent measurement improve jobsite outcomes over time.
Transparency also creates accountability. Share dashboards with subs, field leads, and safety teams so everyone sees the same truths. Organizations using predictive, data-driven reviews reduce incidents faster than those relying on lagging metrics alone.
Safety Mojo is purpose-built for projects that involve multiple subcontractors, overlapping trades, and tight timelines. At its core, Safety Mojo acts as a centralized safety hub for GCs, subcontractors, and owners too. Every observation, inspection, and corrective action automatically feeds into your Dashboard, giving you easy access to critical safety data in real-time.
Safety Mojo uses AI to strengthen safety engagement and simplify communication between general contractors and field teams. By centralizing data, Safety Mojo helps GCs track compliance, manage risk, and maintain visibility across every phase of construction—all from a single platform.
Safety Mojo is also designed for the frontline, not just the office. Crews can complete observations, incident reports, audits, or PTPs directly from their phones or tablets. Our forms even work offline, giving your crews access to tools even when they’re off the grid. This means everyone can participate in safety, no matter where they are.
By combining accessibility, automation, and analytics, Safety Mojo helps general contractors close the visibility gap, streamline compliance, and drive safer outcomes across every subcontractor and site.
Safety Mojo leverages intuitive digital tools and AI-powered processes to streamline safety, improve data collection, and provide deep insights into safety on-site. Here are our most popular AI features, what they do, and how they benefit your safety program.
Instead of filling out forms by hand, Conversational Forms allows users to describe what they see on-site. Safety Mojo’s AI then accurately fills out the form in seconds, taking context from the voice input to fill in any gaps. This feature recognizes voice input in English or Spanish, giving everyone on your crew the opportunity to actively participate in observations and safety data collection.
If your crew already uses whiteboards or paper forms to complete a daily Job Hazard Analysis or Pre-Task Plan, you don’t need to upend what works. Flex Forms lets users capture that information just by taking a photo. Safety Mojo will then digitize the information, saving crucial safety data that might otherwise be lost.
Sick of packing around massive safety manuals and project documentation? With Ask Mojo, your entire crew has easy access to mission-critical information. Simply ask a question and Ask Mojo will find the answer in your documents within seconds. It will also show you the original document where it found the answer so you can be confident you have the correct information.
Get total jobsite visibility across all your projects on one screen with the My Day Dashboard. This AI-powered tool gives you a fast overview of PTPs, permits, observations, corrective actions, and more, so you can manage safety efficiently. Instead of bouncing between projects, you can plan your day quickly to eliminate wasted time. This means you have all the information at the start of your day to make sure everyone is working safely.
Go beyond basic pre-qualification and see how safe a subcontractor really is with Contractor Scorecards. As subcontractors complete tasks on-site, Safety Mojo’s AI will track their performance through safety observations, site audits, incidents, and more. You’ll be able to monitor trends in real-time, trigger targeted interventions, and reward subs for good performance based on hard facts.
So why does AI matter? Let’s dive into the basics of how AI is revolutionizing Data Center safety, allowing for increased visibility, accessibility, accountability, and more.
The promise of Safety Mojo’s AI isn’t about fancy dashboards or automation just because they sound like exciting buzzwords. It’s about removing friction for the people who do the work. For crews in the field, safety often competes with production. There’s always a lot to build and not enough time, especially on Data Center projects. When reporting a hazard takes ten minutes and three forms, it probably won’t happen as often as it needs to.
Instead, AI is helping change that across the board by simplifying how information gets captured. Modern tools like Safety Mojo let workers document conditions through short text entries, voice notes, or quick photos instead of long checklists. The best part? Completing a form with Safety Mojo is 80% faster than doing it by hand. Simplifying safety processes means you’re much more likely to actually get your crew to engage consistently.
AI-first tools like Safety Mojo also improve communication across multiple subs and projects. Construction crews today represent one of the most diverse labor forces in the U.S., with nearly one in four workers born outside the country. This often means that more than a few workers will speak Spanish and struggle with processes and procedures built for English-speaking crews.
Safety Mojo’s AI-driven translation and multilingual interfaces are designed to close that gap. Support for English and Spanish input enables workers to complete conversational forms and access essential information, regardless of their language preference. Once a form is submitted, our AI will automatically translate it, improving the odds that the safety data is accurate.
Paper-based safety has a special way of slowing everything down. Forms get lost, they take time to process, and the information you need might not actually be accurate. If you actually get things uploaded into a spreadsheet, you might waste days of productivity just to create a single report. When are you supposed to act on those insights?
Safety Mojo’s AI-powered Conversational Forms solve that problem by capturing data instantly and making it accessible across all teams in real time. Instead of chasing down paper forms that may be lost, destroyed or illegible, you just describe what you see, assign a corrective action, and instantly submit the form. Safety Mojo reduces the time it takes to complete, submit and analyze forms, which means safety pros have instant access to accurate data.
Transcription errors have also always been a hidden risk. When handwritten notes or spreadsheets are retyped later, small mistakes can distort what really happened. AI-powered forms remove handwriting and transitional steps from the equation, which greatly reduces the margin for error.
If your crew has paper processes that work for them (like JHAs or PTPs), you don’t need to replace them completely. Instead, Flex Forms makes it easy to capture that data just by taking a picture. No matter how you choose to refine your safety program, AI can simplify tasks that otherwise just might not get done.
Safety Mojo’s digital forms are also compliant with OSHA’s electronic submission requirements and record retention rules. You don’t need to worry about reformatting your forms or getting fined for compliance — the data just works the way you and OSHA need it to.
The bottom line: you spend more time in the field managing safety and less time doing paperwork in the office. The faster you get quality data from the frontline, the quicker you can correct potential hazards.
AI also helps your crew work without sacrificing time and accuracy. Two areas that benefit immensely from AI are data reporting and information availability.
Once you’ve collected your data, you need to consolidate and review it. Using Safety Mojo, you can cut out most of the administrative effort using digital tools. As forms, permits, and PTPs are submitted, they’ll automatically be analyzed and uploaded to the My Day Dashboard. That information can then be reviewed, exported, and acted on. Reports that used to take hours to compile now update automatically in the background.
Real-time access to safety information makes a measurable difference. Instead of waiting until the end of the week to get actionable information, safety pros can see where and when a hazard was detected, letting them act on it instantly.
Instant access to crucial safety information also improves efficiency and lets crews work autonomously. Instead of making their best guess or harassing a safety pro for answers to regulatory questions, Ask Mojo closes the gap by finding accurate answers in digital safety documents.
At the end of the day, small tasks like typing out a form or searching a manual for information can waste precious time. Safety Mojo and other AI-powered tools help organizations meet their deadlines without sacrificing safety or quality.
Keeping compliance records like certifications and permits up to date has always been a challenge for large projects. Have you ever had a tradesman forget their paper permit before a specialized project needs to be done? The task falls behind schedule, other subcontractors get held up, and the project screeches to a halt.
Or, the tradesman does the job anyway, gets hurt, and OSHA fines your organization for falling out of compliance.
Safety Mojo’s My Day Dashboard now helps manage that process. Digital permits can be reviewed and approved before work starts each day. Once approved, permits are associated with the worker’s Safety Mojo account and can be reviewed by scanning a QR code.
Safety Mojo also leverages AI to monitor subcontractors, so you don’t need to guess how safe they actually are. Each contractor’s record tells a story. Inspection results, near-miss reporting, incident response times, and completion of corrective actions all paint a picture showing whether or not they’re proactive and safe or a danger to your project.
As subs complete tasks and submit forms, their performance is tracked in their own Contractor Scorecard. By tracking how a subcontractor’s performance shifts over time, safety managers can spot good behavior or early warning signs and respond accordingly.
Comparing similar trades also shines a light on who your on-site role models are. When one electrical crew consistently logs hazards on time or maintains spotless inspection scores, you can point them out as good examples of safety.
Subcontractors can also be granted access to their own scorecard so they can see where they’re falling short and respond accordingly. If you need them to focus on specific metrics, you can fence certain data based on roles assigned in Safety Mojo. This helps build accountability and trust without drowning subcontractors in data.
For most of construction’s history, safety programs have looked backward—counting incidents, logging near misses, and filing reports after the fact. That approach helped track compliance, but it rarely changed outcomes.
Now, AI provides the opportunity for safety programs to be more proactive. When thousands of workers are coordinating on a hyperscale construction site, using smarter data tools like Safety Mojo’s Dashboards automatically track leading and lagging indicators that reveal what’s
Key performance indicators are the foundation of that shift. Instead of just measuring what went wrong, they track what is working and slipping in the moment. Frequent safety observations, near-miss reporting, and participation in pre-task plans all build the backbone of your safety program and show where hazards could appear on-site.
When those numbers start to dip, it is often the first sign of a crew under pressure or a job site running too lean. Accurate data helps safety pros spot potential hazards early and intervene before someone gets hurt. When you’re coordinating dozens of subcontractors, proactive safety can mean the difference in meeting project deadlines and the owners’ expectations.
The most effective safety leaders pair data with action. Predictive dashboards can suggest where to focus attention, but intervention still depends on people. That might mean scheduling an extra walkthrough, holding a quick huddle on recurring issues, or running a targeted safety talk on a trend like dropped objects or line-of-fire exposure. Consistent, focused engagement builds safer habits faster than any safety cop mentality will.
Risk intelligence is also reshaping how resources get deployed. AI models can highlight which zones, trades, or shifts are showing higher exposure levels, allowing managers to shift inspectors, adjust schedules, or add support where it is needed most.
Construction incident rates have trended upward in several sectors over the past few years, illustrating the need for smarter allocation of safety pros’ time and attention. In a world where hazards can multiply overnight, tools like Safety Mojo help safety leaders stay one step ahead of the curve just by providing plenty of insight into the project.
Benchmarking gives safety data the context you need to make smarter decisions on-site. Looking at numbers over time shows whether projects are moving toward stronger performance or drifting off track. But if you don’t set basic standards to work off of, you likely won’t know what’s working and what isn’t without some intuition.
A single data point doesn’t tell you what’s going on on your job site, but trends do. Regular benchmarking helps safety teams recognize early warning signs and measure steady improvement. For large contractors balancing multiple tasks and coordinating with other trades, that clarity keeps everyone’s attention on what is and isn’t working.
Here are a few common safety metrics every GC, owner, and subcontractor should keep an eye on.
While some benchmarks can be measured based on a contractor’s individual performance, measuring some against industry standards can reveal whether or not you’re falling behind. The Bureau of Labor Statistics maintains construction injury and illness rates by subsector, which can serve as a national baseline for evaluating metrics like EMR. If your organization falls below the national averages, you’ll need to step in and provide additional training to fix the problem.
Instead of tracking and monitoring all this data manually, Safety Mojo’s AI does it for you. Once a form is submitted, Safety Mojo’s Dashboards calculate benchmark scores in real time. This helps plan early intervention — If you see your benchmarks start to dip, you can address the problem before it becomes a bigger issue towards the end of the month.
Benchmarks don’t just track lagging performance, either. They shine a light on what is going well, too. When a crew maintains spotless safety records or a subcontractor reduces incidents quarter after quarter, those achievements can help prove a strong safety record and a history of self-improvement. This can help show owners that a GC or subcontractor is a safe bet to work with on high-risk projects like data center builds.
Investigating incidents across multiple trades and subcontractors can be overwhelming, especially when physical reports and forms pile up fast. Safety Mojo makes it easy to get to the bottom of an investigation. Identifying root causes can help prevent future incidents and identify where engagement needs to be improved.
Benchmarking subcontractor performance with Contractor Scorecards can reveal underlying issues that traditional reviews might miss. This helps safety managers spend less time sorting through paperwork and more time addressing the conditions that led to the event. Instead of shuffling through reports to identify who was involved and the severity of the accident, Safety Mojo can provide easy access to that data as it’s submitted.
This accomplishes two things: It gives safety managers and owners the information they need to correct the issue. It also provides a strong paper trail that can help protect an organization in the event of an OSHA inspection. Being able to prove an accident is an isolated incident (and not a recurring trend) can help reduce the severity of citations and protect your bottom line.
Identifying root causes can also single out where your safety program and communication need to be improved. Repeated problems often point to planning gaps or weak communication between trades. Recognizing these links early gives teams a chance to intervene with focused training or improved pre-task planning.
At the scale a data center demands, AI helps distinguish random mistakes from deeper issues. A single late inspection might be human error; repeated delays across multiple crews suggest a process failure. When thousands of inspection forms and reports are submitted every month, using a tool like Safety Mojo’s Dashboards to quickly pull out priority information can make all the difference in correcting problems.
Once you have sufficient safety data, OSHA recommends looking at clusters of incidents instead of considering each one in isolation. That kind of insight allows corrective actions to target systemic causes rather than temporary fixes. After all, a single near miss might not raise a red flag, but the same thing occurring every few days with a single subcontractor suddenly shows a safety pro where their priorities lie.
Following through on root cause analysis also matters just as much as the investigation. Once a corrective action is issued, Safety Mojo can track completion rates and provide insight into how quickly the problem was fixed. This information can help decide whether or not a trade or subcontractor is more risk than they’re worth.
The strongest safety programs never stay the same. They evolve with every project, inspection, and lesson learned. Data-driven analysis with AI helps refine what works and provides the justification to address unsafe behaviors and oversights.
As more organizations implement AI-powered tools to help manage safety, safety pros and owners can track which corrective actions and policy shifts deliver the best results. Strong data analysis provides a foundation to improve safety engagement and culture across trades, which in turn can help reduce incident rates. This approach replaces guesswork with hard evidence, giving GCs the clarity they need to fine-tune safety efforts over time.
Testing new strategies is an important part of that process. Some companies now run small-scale pilot programs—Testing safety briefings, digital tools, or training formats—to see what drives the most engagement and reduces risk. Even a small adjustment, like changing when or how pre-task plan discussions happen, can significantly improve participation and safety information retention. That kind of experimentation turns continuous improvement into a measurable habit, not a once-a-year review.
With Safety Mojo, the return on investment of safety is also easier to quantify. The My Day Dashboard provides easy access to the data safety pros need to identify improvement opportunities and keep everyone working safely. Ultimately, continuous improvement keeps projects humming along smoothly while proactively managing opportunity and financial risk.
The pace and pressure of data center construction have rewritten the rules of what safety leadership means. A strong safety record is no longer a badge of honor for contractors who excel at safety. It’s an essential requirement for any organization hoping to win these massive, lucrative contracts.
The bottom line is that safety isn’t optional in an industry known for increasing incident rates. Owners and operators expect a strong safety culture, regulators demand it, and the workforce values it more than ever. For general contractors, safety performance has also become a direct reflection of how well they manage complexity on massive projects.
AI is positioned to help organizations live up to that reality. Digital platforms, real-time dashboards, and AI-driven analytics give safety teams the visibility they have always needed but rarely had with manual, paper-based safety programs. Tools like Safety Mojo turn static paperwork into live intelligence, helping safety pros make faster, smarter calls that keep work moving and incident rates low.
It’s important to note that AI-powered tools don’t replace the human side of safety. Instead, they enable safety pros to focus on what they do best: training and coaching workers to build a stronger safety culture.
The contractors who embrace this shift to digital safety management are already pulling ahead. They’re completing forms 80% faster, reducing incident rates on their projects, and gathering more data than ever. Their safety data helps them prove safe, consistent performance to owners, reduce insurance costs, and attract stronger subcontractor partners. The result? They’re winning lucrative contracts that may otherwise be difficult or impossible to get without a prior connection.
In this new era of mission-critical data center construction, companies that invest in safety innovation strengthen every part of their operation, from productivity and quality to reputation and trust.
Every general contractor faces a choice: keep managing safety the old way or take a real look at how well it’s working in the field. That starts with an honest review of your program—where work slows down, where information gets lost, and where risks slip through until they turn into problems. Technology can close those gaps, but only if crews are given the time and support to adopt new tools. When you introduce, train, and reinforce AI-powered tools like Safety Mojo, you cut down on monotonous tasks like form-filling and data crunching.
If you’re ready for safer, smarter performance, Safety Mojo helps simplify safety management across large, fast-moving projects and gives everyone—crews, subcontractors, and leadership—live insight into what’s really happening in the field.
“*” indicates required fields
“*” indicates required fields